Legislature(2021 - 2022)ADAMS 519

05/10/2022 09:00 AM House FINANCE

Note: the audio and video recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.

Download Mp3. <- Right click and save file as

* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ SB 204 HUNTING PERMIT/TAG AUCTIONS/RAFFLES TELECONFERENCED
Heard & Held
-- Public Testimony --
+ HB 66 ELECTIONS, VOTING, BALLOTS TELECONFERENCED
<Pending Referral>
Scheduled but Not Heard
+ SB 111 EARLY EDUCATION; READING INTERVENTION TELECONFERENCED
<Pending Referral>
Scheduled but Not Heard
+ Bills Previously Heard/Scheduled TELECONFERENCED
+= HB 220 RETIREMENT SYSTEMS; DEFINED BENEFIT OPT. TELECONFERENCED
Moved CSHB 220(FIN) Out of Committee
CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 204(RES)                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
     "An  Act relating  to auctions  or raffles  for hunting                                                                    
     harvest permits  and big game  tags; and  providing for                                                                    
     an effective date."                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
9:04:19 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR JOSH REVAK, SPONSOR, thanked the committee for                                                                          
hearing the bill. He read the sponsor statement (copy on                                                                        
file):                                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
     Since its  passage in the 1997,  the Governor's Auction                                                                    
     and   Raffle   Tag   program   has   successfully   and                                                                    
     substantially   increased   funding  for   the   Alaska                                                                    
     Department  of Fish  and Game  (ADF&G). In  2021, gross                                                                    
     revenue was  just over  $1.2 million.  SB 204  seeks to                                                                    
     build  on  this  success and  expand  the  department's                                                                    
     ability  to  bring  in   revenue,  which  will  support                                                                    
     wildlife  conservation  and   protection  programs  and                                                                    
     education across Alaska.                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
     Foundationally, Senate  Bill 204 adds three  species to                                                                    
     the available harvest permit  list and standardizes the                                                                    
     number of  game harvest permits that  ADF&G grants each                                                                    
     year   to  qualified   organizations  for   fundraising                                                                    
     auctions or  raffles. By doing so,  the department will                                                                    
     have the  flexibility to issue  up to four  permits for                                                                    
     each  species, taking  into account  the health  of the                                                                    
     game  population  and   recommendations  of  department                                                                    
     biologists  when  determining  the actual  number  that                                                                    
     will be issued each year.                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
     The increased  revenue from this moderate  expansion of                                                                    
     available  harvest permits  will  ensure two  important                                                                    
     outcomes. First,  it allows the department  to maintain                                                                    
     sufficient funds to  continue critical conservation and                                                                    
     wildlife  protection   measures  that  have   been  the                                                                    
     mainstay  of wildlife  management for  decades. Second,                                                                    
     with  the large  increase  in  firearms and  ammunition                                                                    
     sales  and approximately  $18 million  in new  Pittman-                                                                    
     Robertson (PR)  grants coming our way,  ADF&G will need                                                                    
     sufficient  matching dollars  to prevent  these new  PR                                                                    
     funds from reverting back to the federal government.                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
     Modern, effective wildlife  management is becoming more                                                                    
     expensive.  For example,  an increase  of  a couple  of                                                                    
     dollars to aviation  fuel has a major  impact on survey                                                                    
     and  inventory operations  which,  in turn,  are a  key                                                                    
     element   in  setting   game  population   and  harvest                                                                    
     objectives. Without accurate  objectives, for instance,                                                                    
     the Board  of Game cannot make  well-informed decisions                                                                    
     on yearly hunting seasons and bag limits.                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
     In sum,  SB 204 will  allow more federal revenue  to be                                                                    
     leveraged for  critical sustainable  wildlife education                                                                    
     and management  programs and the proactive  work needed                                                                    
     to prevent  new listings  under the  Endangered Species                                                                    
     Act.  Senate  Bill  204 directly  supports  sustainable                                                                    
     wildlife populations, outdoor  traditions, hunters, and                                                                    
     outdoor recreation users.                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair Merrick indicated the committee had been joined by                                                                     
Representative Thompson.                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
9:07:43 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Representative Josephson  inquired about the impacts  of the                                                                    
aerial  survey  work the  senator  had  mentioned. He  asked                                                                    
whether  the  aerial  work  would  help  prevent  Endangered                                                                    
Species Act (ESA) listings.                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
EMMA TORKELSON,  STAFF, SENATOR  JOSH REVAK,  responded that                                                                    
the  work  that  the  Department  of  Fish  and  Game  (DFG)                                                                    
supported with the funds was  wide-ranging. She offered that                                                                    
online testifiers could answer the question in more detail.                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
Representative  Josephson would  follow  up  with Mr.  Eddie                                                                    
Grasser on his question.                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
9:08:52 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
EDDIE GRASSER, DIRECTOR,  DIVISION OF WILDLIFE CONSERVATION,                                                                    
DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND  GAME (via teleconference), supported                                                                    
SB 204 and  thanked Senator Revak for  introducing the bill.                                                                    
He had worked  on the tag program since the  1990s. In 2014,                                                                    
he strengthened the statutes to  make fundraising easier. He                                                                    
explained that the  goal of the legislation was  to make DFG                                                                    
a  self-sufficient  operation.   He  provided  some  history                                                                    
around  the legislation.  Hunters  helped  push through  the                                                                    
Wildlife Restoration Act in  Washington D.C., which elicited                                                                    
the Pittman-Robertson  (PR) grants. He thought  that hunters                                                                    
seemed more  willing to  support wildlife  conservation than                                                                    
most other groups.                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
Mr.  Grasser  relayed  there  was  a  bill  currently  being                                                                    
discussed  by   the  United   States  Congress   called  the                                                                    
Recovering America's Wildlife Act  (RAWA), and if it passed,                                                                    
the  department  would receive  an  influx  of money  almost                                                                    
equal to the money it received  in PR grants. The bill would                                                                    
provide  money  to  states for  the  purpose  of  recovering                                                                    
species listed  as threatened  or endangered.  He emphasized                                                                    
the  importance of  recovering these  species in  Alaska and                                                                    
added that the failure to  do so could negatively affect the                                                                    
state's  economy. However,  RAWA would  require funds  to be                                                                    
matched by the  state in order to receive the  funds, and it                                                                    
would  be very  difficult for  Alaska to  match $32  million                                                                    
under  the current  system.  He thought  SB  204 would  help                                                                    
bring financial stability  to the state and would  be a good                                                                    
first  step. He  had  been  looking at  other  ways for  the                                                                    
department to be  self-supporting and it was  likely that he                                                                    
would  be   back  before   the  committee   with  additional                                                                    
solutions in coming years.                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
9:17:25 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Senator  Revak offered  clarity on  the suggestion  that the                                                                    
bill  would prevent  new listings  under ESA.  The bill  was                                                                    
essentially  focused on  effective  wildlife management.  If                                                                    
hunters   were   educated   and  wildlife   management   was                                                                    
effective, accidental over-hunting would be less likely.                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
Representative  Josephson   wanted  to  support   the  bill.                                                                    
However, he  was concerned  that 70  percent of  the profits                                                                    
would go  to the  department and  30 percent  would go  to a                                                                    
non-profit.   He   was   worried   that   there   would   be                                                                    
misconceptions  about where  the money  was going.  He asked                                                                    
whether language  could be added  to ensure that  the monies                                                                    
could not be used for consumptive purposes.                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
9:20:07 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair  Merrick  indicated  Representative  Rasmussen  had                                                                    
joined the meeting.                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
Senator   Revak   asked   Mr.    Grasser   to   comment   on                                                                    
Representative  Josephson's concerns.  He  did  not know  if                                                                    
specific  funds  could  be directed  to  specific  types  of                                                                    
management.                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
Mr. Grasser thought  there was a way to direct  the funds to                                                                    
specific  management. He  thought  it would  fall under  the                                                                    
same statutes  that provided for the  non-diversion of funds                                                                    
for the  waterfowl and fur-bearing programs.  He shared that                                                                    
he  had already  compiled  a team  to  put together  another                                                                    
piece  of  legislation  in the  following  year  that  would                                                                    
address  some  of  Representative Josephson's  concerns.  He                                                                    
reiterated  that  if  RAWA  passed,  the  state  would  need                                                                    
matching funds to obtain federal dollars.                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
Senator Revak  noted that it  was his intent and  the intent                                                                    
of  the  department to  use  the  funds for  non-consumptive                                                                    
purposes.                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
9:23:19 AM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair Merrick OPENED public testimony.                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair Merrick CLOSED public testimony.                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair  Merrick provided  an  amendment  deadline for  the                                                                    
following day.                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
CSSB 204(RES)  was HEARD and  HELD in committee  for further                                                                    
consideration.                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
9:24:21 AM                                                                                                                    
AT EASE                                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
9:25:42 AM                                                                                                                    
RECONVENED                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                

Document Name Date/Time Subjects
SB 204 Explanation of Changes 3.29.22.pdf HFIN 5/10/2022 9:00:00 AM
SB 204
SB 204 Sponsor Statement Version W 3.29.22.pdf HFIN 5/10/2022 9:00:00 AM
SB 204
SB 204 Sectional Analysis Version W 3.29.22.pdf HFIN 5/10/2022 9:00:00 AM
SB 204
SB 204 Supporting Document Action-Raffle Revenue by Year 2.28.22.pdf HFIN 5/10/2022 9:00:00 AM
SB 204
SB 204 Testimony APHA 3.2.22.pdf HFIN 5/10/2022 9:00:00 AM
SB 204
SB 204 Testimony DF&G 4.28.22.pdf HFIN 5/10/2022 9:00:00 AM
SB 204
SB 204 Testimony RHAK 2.14.22.pdf HFIN 5/10/2022 9:00:00 AM
SB 204
SB 204 Testimony SCI-AK 3.1.22.pdf HFIN 5/10/2022 9:00:00 AM
SB 204
HB220 - AK Stress Test Memo Cheiron 051222.pdf HFIN 5/10/2022 9:00:00 AM
HB 220